LitigationFSA monitors active and potential cases that have statewide or national significance, and has filed briefs at the trial, appellate and Supreme Court levels in both state and federal courts. FSA’s interest has primarily focused on defending the ability of local governments to impose reasonable charges for the management of stormwater, and ensuring that water quality criteria and related policies are scientifically sound. Quick Links: WOTUS - State - Federal - FDEP NNC - MS4 Permit - NNC - Stormwater Utilities Litigation - StateStormwater Utilities - Since the “Gainesville II” decision in 2003, the Florida Supreme Court has not ruled on another case concerning payment of stormwater utility fees by governmental entities. The City of Ocala’s dispute with the Marion County School Board over payment of stormwater utility fees remains the most viable case to be heard by the Supreme Court within the next few years.
FDEP Numeric Nutrient Criteria – On December 8, 2011 the Florida Environmental Regulation Commission adopted FDEP’s version of numeric nutrient criteria for freshwaters. The most important distinctions between the EPA and DEP rules are that DEP’s requires biological confirmation to demonstrate that impairment exists as indicated by nutrient levels, and that ditches, canals and urban stormwater conveyances remain subject to narrative criteria unless a numeric expression of a TMDL or SSAC is developed for the water. The FDEP NNC rules were upheld in Administrative Court on June 7, 2012. EPA approved the regulations on November 30, 2012. The First District Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to the Administrative Court’s decision on February 25, 2013. Litigation - FederalSupreme Court Declines to Hear MS4 Permit Issue - The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal of a decision of the 9th Circuit Court that had been filed by Los Angeles County. The 9th Circuit’s decision concerned Los Angeles’ Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit and found that an exceedance of a water quality standard was an automatic violation of such standards and the Clean Water Act. The decision also confused the purpose of water quality monitoring by MS4s with that of industrial point source discharges. The Supreme Court gave no reason as to why it declined to hear the appeal. Since FSA’s membership is not within the jurisdictional boundaries of the 9th Circuit Court, the 9th’s decision is “persuasive” but does not set precedent for MS4 permit-holders in Florida. Nonetheless, the decision may result in environmental organizations renewing their focus on challenging MS4 permits as a way to drive water quality improvement initiatives. FSA had filed a “Friend of the Court” brief supporting Los Angeles County’s appeal to the US Supreme Court. Los Angeles County had appealed a similar decision of the 9th Circuit to the Supreme Court in 2012 and FSA filed a brief supporting the County at that time. Although the Supreme Court ruled favorably for the County in 2013, that decision concerned an issue that was not directly related to the issues raised in the new appeal. Numeric Nutrient Criteria - In 2009, FSA was the first association of local governments to intervene in the original federal litigation concerning numeric nutrient criteria for the State of Florida. Numerous other parties have since intervened in one or more matters in the courts. Related information:
|